PoliticalChatter

Politics, minus the spin, really it is.

&
 

Oct 31 2008

History is not on Obama’s Side

Published by aebersole at 7:28 am under Current News Edit This

Forget the Bradley effect and toss out the electoral maps on MSNBC and Chuck Todd. The fact is history is not on Barack Obama’s side. Since the end of LBJ, lets look at the presidential history of this nation.

Richard Nixon (R), Gerald Ford (R), Jimmy Carter (D), Ronald Reagan (R), George Bush (R), Bill Clinton (D) and George W. Bush (R). That is exactly two Democratic Presidents since 1968, not a good equation for Barack Obama. Making things even more difficult on Obama is the fact that A. Jimmy Carter was elected after Watergate and B. Bill Clinton, his first term, was the result of a split Republican party. Now, it can be said that the Republicans are battered and bruised, down and out, but something seems to have motivated them in the last few weeks and that something is Obama’s own words.

The recent radio interview tapes released, showing Obama questioning the Constitution and his spread the wealth comments have not only scared the conservatives, but motivated them. We see this in the polls and if we can believe it, the early voting turnout as the difference in Florida is almost zero.

So, what does this all mean? If the conservatives are motivated and with a country that outside of the urban areas, leans center to right are motivated, John McCain will pull this off. If they remain lukewarm  about John McCain, than Barack Obama is the next President of the United States.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

3 Responses to “History is not on Obama’s Side”

  1. threedegreeson 31 Oct 2008 at 8:39 am edit this

    Actually, if you look at this in broader terms, history is on Barack Obama’s side. Whenever the country is in a financial mess, America calls on the Democratic Party. Ford doesn’t count in the equation because Nixon was impeached. Were you correct on this, which you’re not, Gore would have followed Clinton, and McCain likely would’ve been President in 2004.

  2. buzzirkon 31 Oct 2008 at 9:30 am edit this

    Polls have been wrong 14% of the time.Man,this sure looks like it will not be that time when the polls are wrong.I also think the financial mess factor will decide this race.

  3. aebersoleon 02 Nov 2008 at 6:57 pm edit this

    Hey threedegrees….?

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not A Member? Register for Free!

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.